linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAVeFu+a6HVKaB7-4CHqgK50uAtzE6tt_bTWYaNUP55o8xA0Qg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 10:47:30 +0900
From:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] gpio / ACPI: Two minor cleanups related to ACPI_HANDLE()

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:07:36 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As per the subject, avoid evaluating ACPI_HANDLE() if we can as that one is
>> rather costly.
>
> Linus, Alexandre, any objections to this series?
>
> If not, would there be any problem if I took these to my tree?  I'll probably
> have material on top of them.

Sorry for the delay. Looks like Linus just took the patches in his
tree, I hope that's ok?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/