linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/8] seqlock: Better document raw_write_seqcount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:50:56 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, oleg@...hat.com,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/8] seqlock: Better document raw_write_seqcount_latch()

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 02:29:35PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > + * struct entry *latch_query(struct latch_struct *latch, ...)
> > + * {
> > + *	struct entry *entry;
> > + *	unsigned seq;
> > + *	int idx;
> 
> very minor nit: why is seq unsigned, but idx a signed int ?
> Could we do:
> 
>   unsigned seq, idx;   instead ?
> 
> Other than that:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>

Done and thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/