[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55099D0C.40003@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 09:43:08 -0600
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] selftests/timers: change to use shared logic to run
and install tests
On 03/13/2015 09:14 PM, John Stultz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>> Change the timers Makefile to make use of shared run and install
>> logic in lib.mk. Destructive tests are installed. Regular tests
>> are emited to run_kselftest script to match the run_tests behavior.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile | 20 +++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile
>> index 9da3498..61e7284 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/Makefile
>> @@ -7,19 +7,21 @@ bins = posix_timers nanosleep inconsistency-check nsleep-lat raw_skew \
>> alarmtimer-suspend change_skew skew_consistency clocksource-switch \
>> leap-a-day leapcrash set-tai set-2038
>>
>> +TEST_PROGS = posix_timers nanosleep nsleep-lat set-timer-lat mqueue-lat \
>> + inconsistency-check raw_skew
>> +TEST_FILES = threadtest alarmtimer-suspend valid-adjtimex change_skew \
>> + skew_consistency clocksource-switch leap-a-day leapcrash \
>> + set-tai set-2038
>> +
>> +RUN_TESTS_WITH_ARGS := ./threadtest -t 30 -n 8 || echo "selftests: threadtest [FAIL]"
>> +
>> +EMIT_TESTS_WITH_ARGS := echo "$(RUN_TESTS_WITH_ARGS)"
>> +
>
> So my make-foo isn't very strong, but no objections from me.
>
> My only thoughts:
> 1) Would it be better if threadtest can be made to have better
> defaults for kselftest so you don't need that extra logic?
Yes. If you can change the threadset to run with -t 30 -n 8
in default case, that would make the logic simpler. Can you
send me a patch to do this?
> 2) While I get that TEST_FILES is likely going to be used to copy the
> destructive tests over, It feels a little like its being bundled in
> with something like data files that tests might need, which seems sort
> of hackish. Would TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED or something be more clear and
> make more sense?
I agree with you on this. TEST_FILES usage is an overload.
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists