[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1426701379.2258085.242143049.7A720D00@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:56:19 +0100
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>,
mancha <mancha1@...o.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
dborkman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015, at 18:41, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Maybe we should add a kernel self-test that automatically checks
> whether or not memset_explicit() gets optimized away? Otherwise we
> might not notice when gcc or how we implement barrier() or whatever
> else we end up using ends up changing.
>
> It shold be something that is really fast, so it might be a good idea
> to simply automatically run it as part of an __initcall()
> unconditionally. We can debate where the __initcall() lives, but I'd
> prefer that it be run even if the crypto layer isn't configured for
> some reason. Hopefully such an self-test is small enough that the
> kernel bloat people won't complain. :-)
>
> -Ted
Maybe a BUILD_BUGON: ;)
__label__ l1, l2;
char buffer[1024];
l1:
memset(buffer, 0, 1024);
l2:
BUILD_BUGON(&&l1 == &&l2);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists