[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVt9KiWsT37Z_90gBREK1NoSJ2ruT48uv-7QWumYz+TNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 11:06:46 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Roger C. Pao" <rcpao.enmotus@...il.com>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] pmem: Initial version of persistent memory driver
On Mar 9, 2015 8:20 AM, "Boaz Harrosh" <boaz@...xistor.com> wrote:
>
> On 03/06/2015 01:03 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> <>
> >
> > I think it would be nice to have control over the caching mode.
> > Depending on the application, WT or UC could make more sense.
> >
>
> Patches are welcome. say
> map=sss@aaa:WT,sss@aaa:CA, ...
>
> But for us, with direct_access(), all benchmarks show a slight advantage
> for the cached mode.
I'm sure cached is faster. The question is: who flushes the cache?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists