[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150318181652.GA25365@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 14:16:52 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] amd64_edac: enforce synchronous probe
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:45:44AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Without the debug options how can we do that? I will definitely not be
> able to go through all the in-tree drivers myself and see if they can be
> asynchronously probed or not. The most I can do is to try enabling the
> option on our side and fixing the drivers/subsystems that fail with
> asynchronous probing. This will be iterative process for some time and
> then we'll drop the debug option and flip the flag to do asynchronous
> probing by default.
Is this even useful for most drivers? If not, let's just stick with
whitelisting. If it is useful, I worry that we're quite unlikely to
build working blacklist with this approach. idk, having both white
and blacklists tend to end badly.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists