linux-kernel - Re: PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0 in 4.0.0-rc3-2, kvm related?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzD2SSviTwdp70eQ0+F=-eanaw=Awv87mngoQ3MSK5yAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 15:18:13 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc:	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
	Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfried@...glemail.com>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: PANIC: double fault, error_code: 0x0 in 4.0.0-rc3-2, kvm related?

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>
> On Xen, it goes to xen_sysret64, which touches the same percpu
> variables that we touch on entry.  So I still like my percpu vmap
> fault hypothesis, even though I don't understand what would trigger
> it.

I don't dislike the theory per se, but not only don't I see how it
could happen on regular execution on a laptop, but I also don't see
why this fault behavior would be new to 4.0.

(And I do believe that we should make sure that CPU bringup ends up
faulting in the percpu area, even if I don't really see why that would
be the issue here)

Afaik, the system call entry code hasn't changed at all.

What *has* changed is the "paranoid" handling (double-fault has that
magical "paranoid=2" thing, for example) and the return to user-space
code.

Which is really why I don't believe in that syscall thing. Not because
it isn't the obvious culprit, but simply because it hasn't *changed*.

Or is there something subtle I've missed?

                        Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/