linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4 V5] workqueue: Introduce low-level unbound wq sysfs cpumask v5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1426755269.4168.101.camel@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2015 09:54:29 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 V5] workqueue: Introduce low-level unbound wq sysfs
 cpumask v5

On Wed, 2015-03-18 at 12:40 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> This patchset mostly copies from Frederic and split the apply_workqueue_attrs()
> as TJ's suggest.

I plugged these into rt and gave them a go, had no trouble, and no
unbound workqueues perturbing 7 isolated sockets (56 cores).  Poking at
the mask heftily after dropping the shield and giving the box plenty of
generic work to do generated no excitement.  Nice boring testdrive.

> This patchset still doesn't include the patch "workqueue: Allow changing attributions
> of ordered workqueues".

After a brief stare, it looked ok to wedge that one in as well.  Box
didn't tell me I shouldn't have done that.

	-Mike   

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/