linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] mm/compaction: initialize compaction information

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <550A9086.3080508@suse.cz>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:01:58 +0100
From:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:	Gioh Kim <gioh.kim@....com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, mgorman@...e.de
CC:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gunho.lee@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] mm/compaction: initialize compaction information

On 03/19/2015 09:52 AM, Gioh Kim wrote:
> 
> 
> 2015-03-19 오후 5:41에 Vlastimil Babka 이(가) 쓴 글:
>> On 03/19/2015 06:30 AM, Gioh Kim wrote:
>>
>> The code below this comment already does the initialization if the cached values
>> are outside zone boundaries (e.g. due to not being initialized). So if I go
>> through what your __reset_isolation_suitable(zone) call possibly fixes:
>>
>> - the code below comment should take care of zone->compact_cached_migrate_pfn
>> and zone->compact_cached_free_pfn.
>> - the value of zone->compact_blockskip_flush shouldn't affect whether compaction
>> is done.
>> - the state of pageblock_skip bits shouldn't matter for compaction via
>> /proc/sys... as that sets ignore_skip_hint = true
>>
>> It might be perhaps possible that the cached scanner positions are close to
>> meeting and compaction occurs but doesn't process much. That would be also true
>> if both were zero, but at least on my x86 system, lowest zone's start_pfn is 1
>> so that would be detected and corrected. Maybe it is zero on yours though? (ARM?).
> 
> YES, it is. As comment above, my platform is based on ARM.

Ah, I see.

> zone's start_pfn is 0.

OK, good to know that's possible. In that case it's clear that the proper
initialization doesn't happen, and __compact_finished() decides that scanners
have already met at pfn 0.

>>
>> So in any case, the problem should be identified in more detail so we know the
>> fix is not accidental. It could be also worthwile to always reset scanner
>> positions when doing a /proc triggered compaction, so it's not depending on what
>> happened before.
>>
> 
> Excuse my poor english.
> I cannot catch exactly what you want.
> Is this what you want? This resets the position if compaction is started via /proc.

Yes that's right, but..

> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 8c0d945..827ec06 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -1587,8 +1587,10 @@ static void __compact_pgdat(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct compact_control *cc)
>                  INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc->freepages);
>                  INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cc->migratepages);
> 
> -               if (cc->order == -1 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order))
> +               if (cc->order == -1 || !compaction_deferred(zone, cc->order)) {
> +                       __reset_isolation_suitable(zone);

This will also trigger reset when called from kswapd through compact_pgdat() and
!compaction_deferred() is true.
The reset should be restricted to cc->order == -1 which only happens from /proc
trigger.

>                          compact_zone(zone, cc);
> +               }
> 
>                  if (cc->order > 0) {
>                          if (zone_watermark_ok(zone, cc->order,
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/