linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:10:47 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	bhelgaas@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jingle.chen@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace, RAS: remove unnecessary const

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 08:57:56AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> That's a bit of a stretch. But sure, there's no real downside to having
> it, except that it makes one take a double take when seeing it, and
> thinking about why it would even be needed (like I did).

Why? It simply declares the contract that this argument won't be
changed. And if there's no downside, there's no need to do anything
here.

> I think you had the crazy fantasy with the above patch!

Wasn't me.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/