[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1426772033-29277-2-git-send-email-joshc@ni.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:33:53 -0500
From: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>
To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
Cc: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: zynq: drop use of slcr_unlock in zynq_slcr_system_restart
The SLCR is unconditionally unlocked early on boot in zynq_slcr_init()
and not unlocked. As such, it is not necessary to explicitly unlock in
the restart codepath.
Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <joshc@...com>
---
arch/arm/mach-zynq/slcr.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/slcr.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/slcr.c
index fa4c796..698dc3b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/slcr.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/slcr.c
@@ -102,13 +102,6 @@ int zynq_slcr_system_restart(struct notifier_block *nb,
u32 reboot;
/*
- * Unlock the SLCR then reset the system.
- * Note that this seems to require raw i/o
- * functions or there's a lockup?
- */
- zynq_slcr_unlock();
-
- /*
* Clear 0x0F000000 bits of reboot status register to workaround
* the FSBL not loading the bitstream after soft-reboot
* This is a temporary solution until we know more.
--
2.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists