linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: nand: add NAND driver for Broadcom STB NAND controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2015 18:49:21 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
	Anatol Pomazao <anatol@...gle.com>,
	Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
	Corneliu Doban <cdoban@...adcom.com>,
	Jonathan Richardson <jonathar@...adcom.com>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: nand: add NAND driver for Broadcom STB NAND
 controller

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 11:55:16AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 06/03/15 17:18, Brian Norris wrote:
> > +static int brcmnand_revision_init(struct brcmnand_controller *ctrl)
> > +{
> > +	static const unsigned int block_sizes_v6[] = { 8, 16, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 0 };
> > +	static const unsigned int block_sizes_v4[] = { 16, 128, 8, 512, 256, 1024, 2048, 0 };
> > +	static const unsigned int page_sizes[] = { 512, 2048, 4096, 8192, 0 };
> > +
> > +	ctrl->nand_version = nand_readreg(ctrl, 0) & 0xffff;
> > +
> > +	/* Only support v4.0+? */
> > +	if (ctrl->nand_version < 0x0400)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> 
> It could be nice to have an informative error message here that this is
> either:
> 
> - an unknown controller revision (> 7.1)
> - an older controller revision
> - a check against the compatible property, just in case?

I'll add a message that the revision is not supported. The DT binding
should catch this too, so this check is just an extra safeguard.

> [snip]
> 
> > +		ctrl->cs_offsets = brcmnand_cs_offsets_v71;
> > +	} else {
> > +		ctrl->cs_offsets = brcmnand_cs_offsets;
> > +
> > +		/* pre-v5.0 has a different CS0 offset layout */
> > +		if (ctrl->nand_version <= 0x0500)
> > +			ctrl->cs0_offsets = brcmnand_cs_offsets_cs0;
> 
> Based on this check, should the comment should be "pre-v5.0 and v5.0
> have a different CS0 offset layout"?

Yes. Fixed.

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/