[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150319155858.GB19571@brian-ubuntu>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:58:58 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM: dts: brcmstb: add nodes for SATA controller and
PHY
Hi Sergei,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 02:33:32PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 3/19/2015 4:23 AM, Brian Norris wrote:
>
> >Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
> >---
> >Light dependency on:
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-March/331921.html
> >for the surrounding text.
>
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445.dtsi | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> >diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445.dtsi
> >index 9eaeac8dce1b..7a7c4d8c2afe 100644
> >--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445.dtsi
> >+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm7445.dtsi
> >@@ -108,6 +108,42 @@
> > brcm,int-map-mask = <0x25c>, <0x7000000>;
> > brcm,int-fwd-mask = <0x70000>;
> > };
> >+
> >+ sata@...5a000 {
>
> Hm, why the <unit-address> part of the name doesn't correspond to the
> "reg" prop?
Whoops. This .dtsi file is confusing, since none of the Broadcom DTS's I deal
with have the 'ranges' property building in an 0xf0000000 offset in the
/rdb node. All our DTS's give absolute register addresses, not relative.
This discrepancy is a copy-and-paste where I fixed the functional aspect
(the 'reg' property) but overlooked the cosmetic (the name /
unit-address).
We considered just reworking the /rdb node so that it drops the
0xf0000000 offset, in order to be more consistent and to avoid
"mistakes" like this. I could either do that (and use 0xf045a000 in both
places) or just fix the unit address you pointed out.
> >+ compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-ahci", "brcm,sata3-ahci";
> >+ reg-names = "ahci", "top-ctrl";
> >+ reg = <0x45a000 0xa9c>, <0x458040 0x24>;
> >+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 30 0>;
> >+ #address-cells = <1>;
> >+ #size-cells = <0>;
> [...]
> >+ sata_phy: sata-phy@...58100 {
>
> Same question here...
Same answer :)
> >+ compatible = "brcm,bcm7445-sata-phy", "brcm,phy-sata3";
> >+ reg = <0x458100 0x1e00>, <0x45804c 0x10>;
> [...]
Thanks for the review.
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists