[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150319173252.GC10153@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:32:52 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
Punit Agrawal <Punit.Agrawal@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [UPDATED] [PATCH 3/5] arm-cci: Get rid of secure transactions
for PMU driver
One more thing:
> @@ -883,7 +894,11 @@ static inline const struct cci_pmu_model *get_cci_model(struct platform_device *
> pdev->dev.of_node);
> if (!match)
> return NULL;
> + if (match->data)
> + return match->data;
>
> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DEPRECATED compatible property,"
> + "requires secure access to CCI registers");
> return probe_cci_model(pdev);
> }
Before the probe, could we please have:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM))
return -EINVAL;
On arm64 we require a model-specific string, and we shouldn't go
touching secure-only registers.
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists