[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150319174903.GT32500@ld-irv-0074>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:49:03 -0700
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To: vndao@...era.com
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
ngachi86@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd:spi-nor: Add lock and unlock callback functions to
struct spi_nor
Hi Viet,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 01:15:14AM -0700, vndao@...era.com wrote:
> From: VIET NGA DAO <vndao@...era.com>
>
> This patch introduces a properly-replaceable spi_nor callback that does
> flash specific lock and unlock. The existing code for spi_nor_lock and
> spi_nor_unlock is moved into their own functions which are stm_lock and
> stm_unlock.
I'm curious; is this a complete ripoff of my code [1]? You haven't
credited my authorship at all. That's a big no-no. Typically you keep
the 'From:' and Signed-off-by of the original author if you're going to
modify/redistribute it. (Admittedly, I didn't provide the S-o-b on my
informal patch.)
Anyway, that's all fine this time, but please avoid doing this in the
future; I can fix up the authorship, etc., and apply it, if it gets an
Ack/Tested-by from one or more reviewers (e.g., you). BTW, I hope you at
least tested this, right?
Brian
[1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2015-March/058301.html
> Signed-off-by: VIET NGA DAO <vndao@...era.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> index b6a5a0c..43bb552 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c
> @@ -369,17 +369,13 @@ erase_err:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> +static int stm_lock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd;
> uint32_t offset = ofs;
> uint8_t status_old, status_new;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> status_old = read_sr(nor);
>
> if (offset < mtd->size - (mtd->size / 2))
> @@ -402,26 +398,18 @@ static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) {
> write_enable(nor);
> ret = write_sr(nor, status_new);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err;
> }
>
> -err:
> - spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK);
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> +static int stm_unlock(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> - struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = nor->mtd;
> uint32_t offset = ofs;
> uint8_t status_old, status_new;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> status_old = read_sr(nor);
>
> if (offset+len > mtd->size - (mtd->size / 64))
> @@ -444,15 +432,41 @@ static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> (status_old & (SR_BP2 | SR_BP1 | SR_BP0))) {
> write_enable(nor);
> ret = write_sr(nor, status_new);
> - if (ret)
> - goto err;
> }
>
> -err:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int spi_nor_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> +{
> + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = nor->flash_lock(nor, ofs, len);
> +
> spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK);
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int spi_nor_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> +{
> + struct spi_nor *nor = mtd_to_spi_nor(mtd);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = spi_nor_lock_and_prep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_UNLOCK);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = nor->flash_unlock(nor, ofs, len);
> +
> + spi_nor_unlock_and_unprep(nor, SPI_NOR_OPS_LOCK);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* Used when the "_ext_id" is two bytes at most */
> #define INFO(_jedec_id, _ext_id, _sector_size, _n_sectors, _flags) \
> ((kernel_ulong_t)&(struct flash_info) { \
> @@ -1045,6 +1059,10 @@ int spi_nor_scan(struct spi_nor *nor, const char *name, enum read_mode mode)
>
> /* nor protection support for STmicro chips */
> if (JEDEC_MFR(info) == CFI_MFR_ST) {
> + nor->flash_lock = stm_lock;
> + nor->flash_unlock = stm_unlock;
> + }
> + if (nor->flash_lock && nor->flash_unlock) {
> mtd->_lock = spi_nor_lock;
> mtd->_unlock = spi_nor_unlock;
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> index 4720b86..e4e73d5 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spi-nor.h
> @@ -155,6 +155,8 @@ enum spi_nor_option_flags {
> * @write: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] write data to the SPI NOR
> * @erase: [DRIVER-SPECIFIC] erase a sector of the SPI NOR
> * at the offset @offs
> + * @lock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] lock a region of the SPI NOR
> + * @unlock: [FLASH-SPECIFIC] unlock a region of the SPI NOR
> * @priv: the private data
> */
> struct spi_nor {
> @@ -188,6 +190,8 @@ struct spi_nor {
> void (*write)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to,
> size_t len, size_t *retlen, const u_char *write_buf);
> int (*erase)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t offs);
> + int (*flash_lock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len);
> + int (*flash_unlock)(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len);
>
> void *priv;
> };
> --
> 1.7.11.GIT
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists