[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150319183001.GD19657@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 14:30:01 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: riel@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
lizefan@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/4] cpusets,isolcpus: exclude isolcpus from
load balancing in cpusets
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:12:06PM -0400, riel@...hat.com wrote:
> Ensure that cpus specified with the isolcpus= boot commandline
> option stay outside of the load balancing in the kernel scheduler.
>
> Operations like load balancing can introduce unwanted latencies,
> which is exactly what the isolcpus= commandline is there to prevent.
>
> Previously, simply creating a new cpuset, without even touching the
> cpuset.cpus field inside the new cpuset, would undo the effects of
> isolcpus=, by creating a scheduler domain spanning the whole system,
> and setting up load balancing inside that domain. The cpuset root
> cpuset.cpus file is read-only, so there was not even a way to undo
> that effect.
>
> This does not impact the majority of cpusets users, since isolcpus=
> is a fairly specialized feature used for realtime purposes.
>
> This version fixes the UP compilation issue, in the same way done
> for the other cpumasks.
Applied 1, 2, and 4 to cgroup/for-4.1. I collected the acks from the
previous threads. Can you please collect them when posting new
revisions in the future?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists