[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150319150901.a004c3dc15a49a1859e467ff@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:09:01 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@...escale.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/dma-debug: fix bucket_find_contain
On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 19:24:29 +0100 (CET) Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> bucket_find_contain will search the bucket list for a dma_debug_entry. When
> the entry isn't found it needs to search other buckets too, since only the
> start address of a dma range is hashed (which might be in a different bucket).
>
> A copy of the dma_debug_entry is used to get the previous hash bucket but when
> its list is searched the original dma_debug_entry is to be used not its
> modified copy.
>
> This fixes false "device driver tries to sync DMA memory it has not allocated"
> warnings.
The changelog doesn't help me understand how serious this is. A 4.0
thing? -stable?
> --- a/lib/dma-debug.c
> +++ b/lib/dma-debug.c
> @@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static struct dma_debug_entry *bucket_fi
> unsigned int range = 0;
>
> while (range <= max_range) {
> - entry = __hash_bucket_find(*bucket, &index, containing_match);
> + entry = __hash_bucket_find(*bucket, ref, containing_match);
>
> if (entry)
> return entry;
This code just got more confusing :( Are you sure we aren't supposed to
use `ref' in bucket_find_contain()'s call to get_hash_bucket()?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists