linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 55/80] net: cls_bpf: fix size mismatch on filter preparation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1426804568-2907-56-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:35:43 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 55/80] net: cls_bpf: fix size mismatch on filter preparation

3.13.11-ckt17 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>

commit 7913ecf69e24bd7575e0d0325eda3b43c8cfa749 upstream.

In cls_bpf_modify_existing(), we read out the number of filter blocks,
do some sanity checks, allocate a block on that size, and copy over the
BPF instruction blob from user space, then pass everything through the
classic BPF checker prior to installation of the classifier.

We should reject mismatches here, there are 2 scenarios: the number of
filter blocks could be smaller than the provided instruction blob, so
we do a partial copy of the BPF program, and thus the instructions will
either be rejected from the verifier or a valid BPF program will be run;
in the other case, we'll end up copying more than we're supposed to,
and most likely the trailing garbage will be rejected by the verifier
as well (i.e. we need to fit instruction pattern, ret {A,K} needs to be
last instruction, load/stores must be correct, etc); in case not, we
would leak memory when dumping back instruction patterns. The code should
have only used nla_len() as Dave noted to avoid this from the beginning.
Anyway, lets fix it by rejecting such load attempts.

Fixes: 7d1d65cb84e1 ("net: sched: cls_bpf: add BPF-based classifier")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 net/sched/cls_bpf.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
index 1002a82..520b1a4 100644
--- a/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
+++ b/net/sched/cls_bpf.c
@@ -186,6 +186,11 @@ static int cls_bpf_modify_existing(struct net *net, struct tcf_proto *tp,
 	}

 	bpf_size = bpf_len * sizeof(*bpf_ops);
+	if (bpf_size != nla_len(tb[TCA_BPF_OPS])) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto errout;
+	}
+
 	bpf_ops = kzalloc(bpf_size, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (bpf_ops == NULL) {
 		ret = -ENOMEM;
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/