[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150320101246.GF3087@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:12:46 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures
occur
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 06:29:47PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And the VM_WRITE test should be stable and not have any subtle
> interaction with the other changes that the numa pte things
> introduced. It would be good to see if the profiles then pop something
> *else* up as the performance difference (which I'm sure will remain,
> since the 7m50s was so far off).
>
As a side-note, I did test a patch that checked pte_write and preserved
it across both faults and setting the protections. It did not alter
migration activity much but there was a drop in minor faults - 20% drop in
autonumabench, 58% drop in xfsrepair workload. I'm assuming this is due to
refaults to mark pages writable. The patch looks and is hacky so I won't
post it to save people bleaching their eyes. I'll spend some time soon
(hopefully today) at a smooth way of falling through to WP checks after
trapping a NUMA fault.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists