linux-kernel - Re: Linux Kernel Scheduling Addition Notification : Hybrid Sleepers and Unfair scheduling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150320015318.GB3425@thunk.org>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2015 21:53:18 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Mitchell Erblich <erblichs@...thlink.net>
Cc:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux Kernel Scheduling Addition Notification : Hybrid Sleepers
 and Unfair scheduling

There is no legal requirement for anyone to give notification when
they make changes to the Linux kernel.  There are some experimental
licenses that have such a requirement, but the Linux kernel is not
licensed under such a license.

If you are aware that a company has made modifications and is shipping
code (i.e., making copies as defined by local copyright law), then you
can certainly talk to people who are interested in enforcing the GPL.
But the LKML isn't a proper venue for such discussion.

Cheers,

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/