[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1426861282.3643.472.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:21:22 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...aro.org>
Cc: bk rakesh <rakeshbkrish@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: Hardware support for vt-posted interrupts described in
vt-directed-io-spec for assigned devices
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:10 +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 03/20/2015 03:04 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 15:24 +0530, bk rakesh wrote:
> >> Adding few more information regarding the setup which i had created to
> >> test the vt-d posted interrupts for assigned devices,
> >>
> >> Hardware used for evaluating vt-posted interrupts
> >> cpu "E5-2620 v2 @ 2.10GHz" and "S2600CP server board"
> >>
> >> I had used kernel-3.18 patched with "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward
> >> control(posted by eric.auger@...aro.org)",
> >
> > IRQ forwarding in an ARM technology for handling level triggered
> > interrupts, not Intel, not even x86.
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> Feng's series relies on few pacth files in "KVM-VFIO IRQ forward
> control", basically for KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE group introduction in
> KVM-VFIO. This explains why you find some references to that patch here
> I guess.
Ah yes, makes sense. Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists