linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V7] Allow compaction of unevictable pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:47:04 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V7] Allow compaction of unevictable pages

On 03/20/2015 09:49 AM, Eric B Munson wrote:
> Currently, pages which are marked as unevictable are protected from
> compaction, but not from other types of migration.  The POSIX real time
> extension explicitly states that mlock() will prevent a major page
> fault, but the spirit of this is that mlock() should give a process the
> ability to control sources of latency, including minor page faults.
> However, the mlock manpage only explicitly says that a locked page will
> not be written to swap and this can cause some confusion.  The
> compaction code today does not give a developer who wants to avoid swap
> but wants to have large contiguous areas available any method to achieve
> this state.  This patch introduces a sysctl for controlling compaction
> behavior with respect to the unevictable lru.  Users that demand no page
> faults after a page is present can set compact_unevictable_allowed to 0
> and users who need the large contiguous areas can enable compaction on
> locked memory by leaving the default value of 1.
> 
> To illustrate this problem I wrote a quick test program that mmaps a
> large number of 1MB files filled with random data.  These maps are
> created locked and read only.  Then every other mmap is unmapped and I
> attempt to allocate huge pages to the static huge page pool.  When the
> compact_unevictable_allowed sysctl is 0, I cannot allocate hugepages
> after fragmenting memory.  When the value is set to 1, allocations
> succeed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric B Munson <emunson@...mai.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>

Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/