[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k2ybd8jl.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:53:50 +0200
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Pratik Patel <pratikp@...eaurora.org>, peter.lachner@...el.com,
norbert.schulz@...el.com, keven.boell@...el.com,
yann.fouassier@...el.com, laurent.fert@...el.com,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 01/11] stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> writes:
> As promised I worked on a prototype that connects the coresight-stm
> driver with the generic STM interface you have suggested. Things work
> quite well and aside from the enhancement related to the ioctl() and
> private member as discussed above, we should move ahead with this.
>
> I will send out a new version of the coresight-stm driver as soon as I
> see your patches with those changes.
Actually, instread of a private member I'd simply pass struct stm_data
pointer to the callback (like we do with other callbacks) and the
private data would be in the structure that embeds this struct stm_data,
so that you can get to it using container_of():
struct my_stm {
struct stm_data data;
void *my_stuff;
...
};
...
long my_ioctl(struct stm_data *data, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long
arg)
{
struct my_stm *mine = container_of(data, struct my_stm, data);
...
Would this work for you? I'm otherwise ready to send the second version
of my patchset.
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists