linux-kernel - Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/4 RESEND] ocfs2: need to handle error for ocfs2_journal_access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHb8M2DMYK8weUSvYOuk5AhsQrFnq3NaqJYG7hEgre=wKVvTOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:34:25 +0900
From:	DaeSeok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
To:	Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>
Cc:	mfasheh@...e.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
	"ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH 3/4 RESEND] ocfs2: need to handle error for
 ocfs2_journal_access_di() call

OK.

I will send this patch again.
This patch will be based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/27/655

thanks

regards,
Daeseok Youn

2015-03-19 20:00 GMT+09:00 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>:
> On 2015/2/28 7:51, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> There is no error handle when ocfs2_journal_access_di() is failed.
>> And also it doesn't need to call ocfs2_dx_dir_insert() when
>> ocfs2_journal_access_db() is failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@...il.com>
>> ---
>> RESEND: this patch rebased by 1/4
>>
>>  fs/ocfs2/dir.c |    8 ++++----
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> index c1ab24f..c63f2b6 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> @@ -1703,15 +1703,15 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
>>                                                                insert_bh,
>>                                             OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>
>> -                             if (ocfs2_dir_indexed(dir)) {
>> +                             if (!retval && ocfs2_dir_indexed(dir))
>>                                       retval = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
>>                                                               handle,
>>                                                               lookup);
>> -                                     if (retval)
>> -                                             goto bail;
>> -                             }
>>                       }
>>
>> +                     if (retval)
>> +                             goto bail;
>> +
>>                       /* By now the buffer is marked for journaling */
>>                       offset += le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len);
>>                       if (le64_to_cpu(de->inode)) {
>>
> I agree with you that we should do the corresponding check.
> But I don't think we need remove the mlog as described in my previous
> mail.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/