linux-kernel - Re: d_path() and overlay fs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:25:58 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
	Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>, dhowells@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: d_path() and overlay fs

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 05:01:23PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> But it does take care of the majority of f_path users that actually want the
> covering path.

Bloody bad idea, IMO.  I have no objections against adding _helpers_ from
that patch (seq_file_path(), etc.), but I really don't like adding that
second struct path there.  And it still doesn't fix the issue with
LSM, etc., so we'll _still_ need to fix it sane way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/