linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] hung_task: improve the rcu_lock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:55:36 +0000
From:	Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
	dwysocha@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hung_task: improve the rcu_lock_break() logic

On Tue 2015-03-17 20:25 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks() stops after rcu_lock_break() if either
> "t" or "g" exits, this is suboptimal.
> 
> If "t" is alive, we can always continue, t->group_leader can be used as the
> new "g". We do not even bother to check g != NULL in this case.
> 
> If "g" is alive, we can at least continue the outer for_each_process() loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
>  kernel/hung_task.c |   29 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/hung_task.c b/kernel/hung_task.c
> index 4735b99..f488059 100644
> --- a/kernel/hung_task.c
> +++ b/kernel/hung_task.c
> @@ -134,20 +134,26 @@ static void check_hung_task(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long timeout)
>   * For preemptible RCU it is sufficient to call rcu_read_unlock in order
>   * to exit the grace period. For classic RCU, a reschedule is required.
>   */
> -static bool rcu_lock_break(struct task_struct *g, struct task_struct *t)
> +static void rcu_lock_break(struct task_struct **g, struct task_struct **t)
>  {
> -	bool can_cont;
> +	bool alive;
> +
> +	get_task_struct(*g);
> +	get_task_struct(*t);
>  
> -	get_task_struct(g);
> -	get_task_struct(t);
>  	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	cond_resched();
>  	rcu_read_lock();
> -	can_cont = pid_alive(g) && pid_alive(t);
> -	put_task_struct(t);
> -	put_task_struct(g);
>  
> -	return can_cont;
> +	alive = pid_alive(*g);
> +	put_task_struct(*g);
> +	if (!alive)
> +		*g = NULL;
> +
> +	alive = pid_alive(*t);
> +	put_task_struct(*t);
> +	if (!alive)
> +		*t = NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -178,7 +184,12 @@ static void check_hung_uninterruptible_tasks(unsigned long timeout)
>  
>  			if (!--batch_count) {
>  				batch_count = HUNG_TASK_BATCHING;
> -				if (!rcu_lock_break(g, t))
> +				rcu_lock_break(&g, &t);
> +				if (t)		/* in case g == NULL */
> +					g = t->group_leader;
> +				else if (g)	/* continue the outer loop */
> +					break;
> +				else		/* both dead */
>  					goto unlock;
>  			}
>  			/* use "==" to skip the TASK_KILLABLE tasks */

Looks good to me. Thanks.

Acked-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/