[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550C5993.9030104@youngman.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 17:32:03 +0000
From: Wols Lists <antlists@...ngman.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>
CC: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, riel@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org,
linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
mgorman@...e.de, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-nvdimm] [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the
block layer
On 19/03/15 19:59, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This is all contingent upon the prevalence of machines which have vast
> amounts of nv memory and relatively small amounts of regular memory.
> How confident are we that this really is the future?
Somewhat off-topic, but it's also the past. I can't help thinking of the
early Pick machines, which treated backing store as one giant permanent
virtual memory. Back when 300Mb hard drives were HUGE.
Cheers,
Wol
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists