lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550C6F53.5090707@oracle.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:04:51 -0600
From:	David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4.0.0-rc4: panic in free_block

On 3/20/15 12:53 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> SLUB should definitely be considered a stable allocator.  It's the
> default allocator for at least Fedora, and that presumably means all
> of Redhat.
>
> SuSE seems to use SLAB still, though, so it must be getting lots of
> testing on x86 too.
>
> Did you test with SLUB? Does it work there?

sorry, forgot to add that detail in the last response: it works fine. No 
panics at all with SLUB.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ