[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150320002311.GG28621@dastard>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 11:23:11 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, xfs@....sgi.com,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: numa: Slow PTE scan rate if migration failures
occur
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:05:46PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Can you try Mel's change to make it use
>
> if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_WRITE))
>
> instead of the pte details? Again, on otherwise plain 3.19, just so
> that we have a baseline. I'd be *so* much happer with checking the vma
> details over per-pte details, especially ones that change over the
> lifetime of the pte entry, and the NUMA code explicitly mucks with.
$ sudo perf_3.18 stat -a -r 6 -e migrate:mm_migrate_pages sleep 10
Performance counter stats for 'system wide' (6 runs):
266,750 migrate:mm_migrate_pages ( +- 7.43% )
10.002032292 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.00% )
Bit more variance there than the pte checking, but runtime
difference is in the noise - 5m4s vs 4m54s - and profiles are
identical to the pte checking version.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists