linux-kernel - Re: 4.0.0-rc4: panic in free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <550C7C8C.2020309@intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 13:01:16 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 4.0.0-rc4: panic in free_block

On 03/20/2015 09:58 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 128 cpu's is still "unusual", of course, but by no means unheard of,
> and I'f have expected others to report it too if it was wasy to
> trigger on x86-64.

FWIW, I configured a kernel with SLAB and kicked off a bunch of compiles
on a 160-thread x86_64 system.  It definitely doesn't die _quickly_.
It's been running for an hour or two.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/