[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <550C857F.5060705@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 22:39:27 +0200
From: "Grygorii.Strashko@...aro.org" <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux GPIO List <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT OMAP1 PATCH 7/8] gpio: omap: get rid of omap_irq_to_gpio()
On 03/20/2015 08:56 PM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello Grygorii,
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:25 PM, <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org> wrote:
>> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>
>>
>> Now OMAP GPIO driver prepared for omap_irq_to_gpio() removing.
>> Do it ;)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...aro.org>
>
> I don't have access to OMAP1 boards to test but Tony did it o an
> osk5912 and Aaro can confirm that it doesn't cause regressions on
> other OMAP1 boards.
Thanks. But could you clarify one point to me please?
"Aaro can confirm that it doesn't cause regressions on
other OMAP1 boards" - Does It mean I can add his Tested-by?
Or I still have to wait for his direct reply?
Just to avoid any confusions ;)
> Acked-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
>
--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists