linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/13] security/selinux: check for LOOKUP_RCU in _follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 20 Mar 2015 05:12:24 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] security/selinux: check for LOOKUP_RCU in
 _follow_link.

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 03:39:30PM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> 	rcu_read_unlock();
> 	security_compute_av(ssid, tsid, tclass, avd);
> 	rcu_read_lock();
> 
> (yes: unlock, and then lock).
>
> so avc_has_perm_noaudit needs to bail out of RCU-walk if node turns out to be
> NULL.

NFI, but since
	a) the guts of security_compute_av() are under rwlock (shared),
I rather doubt that it could e.g. block
	b) avc_has_perm_noaudit() is called from selinux_inode_permission(),
which is called inside RCU-walk - it's hit on selinux setups in every
successful inode_permission()
I'd say that it's no worse than it already was.  AFAICS, it's a slowpath and
we don't want to hold rcu_read_lock() over it to avoid stalls, but if the
caller of avc_has_perm_noaudit() used to want rcu_read_lock(), well, we'll
just risks stalls
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/