| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1426920332-9340-5-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 23:45:23 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/13] clk: Add safe switch hook
Sometimes clocks can't accept their parent source turning off
while the source is reprogrammed to a different rate. Most
notably CPU clocks require a way to switch away from the current
PLL they're running on, reprogram that PLL to a new rate, and
then switch back to the PLL with the new rate once they're done.
Add a hook that drivers can implement allowing them to return a
'safe parent' that they can switch their parent to while the
upstream source is reprogrammed to support this.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
---
This patch is good enough for Krait, but soon I'll need to
support a "safe rate" where we ask a clock what rate it needs to be running
at to be sure it's within voltage constraints. Right now safe parent
handles that problem on Krait, but on other platforms it won't work.
drivers/clk/clk.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 0712bea649c1..ead015a8e047 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -56,9 +56,12 @@ struct clk_core {
struct clk_core **parents;
u8 num_parents;
u8 new_parent_index;
+ u8 safe_parent_index;
unsigned long rate;
unsigned long req_rate;
+ unsigned long old_rate;
unsigned long new_rate;
+ struct clk_core *safe_parent;
struct clk_core *new_parent;
struct clk_core *new_child;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1550,7 +1553,8 @@ out:
static void clk_calc_subtree(struct clk_core *clk, unsigned long new_rate,
struct clk_core *new_parent, u8 p_index)
{
- struct clk_core *child;
+ struct clk_core *child, *parent;
+ struct clk_hw *parent_hw;
clk->new_rate = new_rate;
clk->new_parent = new_parent;
@@ -1560,6 +1564,18 @@ static void clk_calc_subtree(struct clk_core *clk, unsigned long new_rate,
if (new_parent && new_parent != clk->parent)
new_parent->new_child = clk;
+ if (clk->ops->get_safe_parent) {
+ parent_hw = clk->ops->get_safe_parent(clk->hw);
+ if (parent_hw) {
+ parent = parent_hw->core;
+ p_index = clk_fetch_parent_index(clk, parent);
+ clk->safe_parent_index = p_index;
+ clk->safe_parent = parent;
+ }
+ } else {
+ clk->safe_parent = NULL;
+ }
+
hlist_for_each_entry(child, &clk->children, child_node) {
child->new_rate = clk_recalc(child, new_rate);
clk_calc_subtree(child, child->new_rate, NULL, 0);
@@ -1655,14 +1671,43 @@ static struct clk_core *clk_propagate_rate_change(struct clk_core *clk,
unsigned long event)
{
struct clk_core *child, *tmp_clk, *fail_clk = NULL;
+ struct clk_core *old_parent;
int ret = NOTIFY_DONE;
- if (clk->rate == clk->new_rate)
+ if (clk->rate == clk->new_rate && event != POST_RATE_CHANGE)
return NULL;
+ switch (event) {
+ case PRE_RATE_CHANGE:
+ if (clk->safe_parent)
+ clk->ops->set_parent(clk->hw, clk->safe_parent_index);
+ clk->old_rate = clk->rate;
+ break;
+ case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
+ if (clk->safe_parent) {
+ old_parent = __clk_set_parent_before(clk,
+ clk->new_parent);
+ if (clk->ops->set_rate_and_parent) {
+ clk->ops->set_rate_and_parent(clk->hw,
+ clk->new_rate,
+ clk->new_parent ?
+ clk->new_parent->rate : 0,
+ clk->new_parent_index);
+ } else if (clk->ops->set_parent) {
+ clk->ops->set_parent(clk->hw,
+ clk->new_parent_index);
+ }
+ __clk_set_parent_after(clk, clk->new_parent,
+ old_parent);
+ }
+ break;
+ }
+
if (clk->notifier_count) {
- ret = __clk_notify(clk, event, clk->rate, clk->new_rate);
- if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK)
+ if (event != POST_RATE_CHANGE || clk->old_rate != clk->rate)
+ ret = __clk_notify(clk, event, clk->old_rate,
+ clk->new_rate);
+ if (ret & NOTIFY_STOP_MASK && event != POST_RATE_CHANGE)
fail_clk = clk;
}
@@ -1708,7 +1753,8 @@ clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *clk, unsigned long best_parent_rate)
old_rate = clk->rate;
- if (clk->new_parent && clk->new_parent != clk->parent) {
+ if (clk->new_parent && clk->new_parent != clk->parent &&
+ !clk->safe_parent) {
old_parent = __clk_set_parent_before(clk, clk->new_parent);
if (clk->ops->set_rate_and_parent) {
@@ -1728,9 +1774,6 @@ clk_change_rate(struct clk_core *clk, unsigned long best_parent_rate)
clk->rate = clk->new_rate;
- if (clk->notifier_count && old_rate != clk->rate)
- __clk_notify(clk, POST_RATE_CHANGE, old_rate, clk->rate);
-
/*
* Use safe iteration, as change_rate can actually swap parents
* for certain clock types.
@@ -1790,6 +1833,8 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *clk,
clk->req_rate = req_rate;
+ clk_propagate_rate_change(top, POST_RATE_CHANGE);
+
return ret;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/clk-provider.h b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
index f7a6f60f8e0c..bc0f6faaeda4 100644
--- a/include/linux/clk-provider.h
+++ b/include/linux/clk-provider.h
@@ -183,6 +183,7 @@ struct clk_ops {
struct clk_hw **best_parent_hw);
int (*set_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index);
u8 (*get_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw);
+ struct clk_hw *(*get_safe_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw);
int (*set_rate)(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
unsigned long parent_rate);
int (*set_rate_and_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw,
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists