[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323085209.GA28965@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:52:09 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
user-mode-linux-user@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, cov@...eaurora.org,
criu@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm: Introducing arch_remap hook
* Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Some architecture would like to be triggered when a memory area is moved
> through the mremap system call.
>
> This patch is introducing a new arch_remap mm hook which is placed in the
> path of mremap, and is called before the old area is unmapped (and the
> arch_unmap hook is called).
>
> To no break the build, this patch adds the empty hook definition to the
> architectures that were not using the generic hook's definition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 5 +++++
> arch/unicore32/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h | 6 ++++++
> include/asm-generic/mm_hooks.h | 6 ++++++
> mm/mremap.c | 9 +++++++--
> 6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 8fb3802f8fad..ddd861a490ba 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -131,4 +131,10 @@ static inline void arch_bprm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm,
> {
> }
>
> +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> + unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #endif /* __S390_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
> diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 941527e507f7..f499b017c1f9 100644
> --- a/arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/um/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ static inline void arch_bprm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> }
> +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> + unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
> +{
> +}
> /*
> * end asm-generic/mm_hooks.h functions
> */
> diff --git a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 1cb5220afaf9..39a0a553172e 100644
> --- a/arch/unicore32/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/unicore32/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -97,4 +97,10 @@ static inline void arch_bprm_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm,
> {
> }
>
> +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> + unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> index 883f6b933fa4..75cb71f4be1e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mmu_context.h
> @@ -172,4 +172,10 @@ static inline void arch_unmap(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> mpx_notify_unmap(mm, vma, start, end);
> }
>
> +static inline void arch_remap(struct mm_struct *mm,
> + unsigned long old_start, unsigned long old_end,
> + unsigned long new_start, unsigned long new_end)
> +{
> +}
> +
> #endif /* _ASM_X86_MMU_CONTEXT_H */
So instead of spreading these empty prototypes around mmu_context.h
files, why not add something like this to the PPC definition:
#define __HAVE_ARCH_REMAP
and define the empty prototype for everyone else? It's a bit like how
the __HAVE_ARCH_PTEP_* namespace works.
That should shrink this patch considerably.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists