[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323115754.GN4441@8bytes.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:57:54 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4 2/8] iommu, x86: Define new irte structure for VT-d
Posted-Interrupts
Hi Feng,
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:06:58PM +0800, Feng Wu wrote:
> Add a new irte_pi structure for VT-d Posted-Interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Feng Wu <feng.wu@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/dmar.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/dmar.h b/include/linux/dmar.h
> index 8473756..c7f9cda 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmar.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmar.h
> @@ -212,6 +212,38 @@ struct irte {
> };
> };
>
> +struct irte_pi {
I think it is better to put this as a union into struct irte. It saves
memory and unnecessary casting in later patches.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists