linux-kernel - [tip:x86/fpu] x86/fpu: Introduce restore_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2015 05:20:59 -0700
From:	tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov <tipbot@...or.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	dave.hansen@...el.com, sbsiddha@...il.com,
	quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	bp@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com,
	riel@...hat.com, fenghua.yu@...el.com, mingo@...nel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, luto@...capital.net, oleg@...hat.com,
	priikone@....fi
Subject: [tip:x86/fpu] x86/fpu: Introduce restore_init_xstate()

Commit-ID:  8f4d81863ba4e8dfee93bd50840f1099a296251f
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8f4d81863ba4e8dfee93bd50840f1099a296251f
Author:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:34:29 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:13:58 +0100

x86/fpu: Introduce restore_init_xstate()

Extract the "use_eager_fpu()" code from drop_init_fpu() into a new,
simple helper restore_init_xstate(). The next patch adds another user.

- It is not clear why we do not check use_fxsr() like fpu_restore_checking()
  does. eager_fpu_init_bp() calls setup_init_fpu_buf() too, and we have the
  "eagerfpu=on" kernel option.

- Ignoring the fact that init_xstate_buf is "struct xsave_struct *", not
  "union thread_xstate *", it is not clear why we can not simply use
  fpu_restore_checking() and avoid the code duplication.

- It is not clear why we can't call setup_init_fpu_buf() unconditionally
  to always create init_xstate_buf(). Then do_device_not_available() path
  (at least) could use restore_init_xstate() too. It doesn't need to init
  fpu->state, its content doesn't matter until unlazy_fpu()/__switch_to()/etc
  which overwrites this memory anyway.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pekka Riikonen <priikone@....fi>
Cc: Quentin Casasnovas <quentin.casasnovas@...cle.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150311173429.GD5032@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
index c58c930..7d2f7fa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fpu-internal.h
@@ -401,16 +401,20 @@ static inline void drop_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
+static inline void restore_init_xstate(void)
+{
+	if (use_xsave())
+		xrstor_state(init_xstate_buf, -1);
+	else
+		fxrstor_checking(&init_xstate_buf->i387);
+}
+
 static inline void drop_init_fpu(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
 	if (!use_eager_fpu())
 		drop_fpu(tsk);
-	else {
-		if (use_xsave())
-			xrstor_state(init_xstate_buf, -1);
-		else
-			fxrstor_checking(&init_xstate_buf->i387);
-	}
+	else
+		restore_init_xstate();
 }
 
 /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/