linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] octeon-usb:Fix coding style issue with space between function name and opening bracket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:06:26 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	aaro.koskinen@....fi, pauldaviesc@...il.com,
	nitinkuppelur@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	br@...amon.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] octeon-usb:Fix coding style issue with space between
 function name and opening bracket

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 08:53:19AM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> 
> 
> On March 23, 2015 6:40:06 AM EDT, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> >On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 08:04:35PM -0400, Nicholas Krause wrote:
> >> Fixes the checkpath.pl error where the opening bracket has a unneeded
> >space between
> >> it and the function name for a if statement in the
> >marco,VMX_WAIT_FOR_FIELD32.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c | 2 +-
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c
> >b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c
> >> index 1daeb31..0408a12 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/octeon-usb/octeon-hcd.c
> >> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ struct octeon_hcd {
> >>  		type c;							    \
> >>  		while (1) {						    \
> >>  			c.u32 = __cvmx_usb_read_csr32(usb, address);	    \
> >> -			if (c.s.field op (value)) {			    \
> >> +			if (c.s.field op(value)) {			    \
> >
> >"op" is not a function here.  This is macro and top is an operation
> >like
> >"+" or "*".  So checkpatch.pl is wrong.
> >
> >regards,
> >dan carpenter
> Very well then, I wasn't sure if we did the  same spacing style for marcos. 

We do but this is a very unusual case.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/