[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323093013.15b6070b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:30:13 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
Ananth NMavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kprobes: Disable Kprobe when ftrace arming fails
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:39:55 +0100
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.cz> wrote:
> > wth is a 'universe' in this context?
>
> We use the term "universe" to define whether the system or task uses
> original or patched functions. It is especially important for patches
> that modify semantic of functions. They need more complex consistency
> model. It defines when it is safe time for the system or task to start
> using the new functions (switch to the new universe).
>
> In theory, different tasks might be in more universes if more patches are
> being applied. In practice, we deal with only two universes. The trick is
> that we allow to add new patch only when the whole system has switched
> to the previous one.
>
Is this terminology documented anywhere upstream yet?
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists