[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323101815.35bd61c7@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:18:15 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: stop using PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack)
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:44:37 +0100
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> Instead of PER_CPU_VAR(kernel_stack), 64-bit code
> can use PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_tss + TSS_sp0).
The change log here is lacking an answer to "why". It only states what
it does. What's wrong with using kernel_stack? The change log should
explicitly state that. I have no idea why this patch is needed.
-- Steve
>
> 32-bit code switches to PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack),
> which has the same value.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists