[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5510288C.3020702@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:51:56 +0000
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patches@...aro.org,
linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Andrew Thoelke <andrew.thoelke@....com>,
Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/7] printk: Simple implementation for NMI backtracing
On 19/03/15 19:01, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 18:48:10 +0000
> Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
> \
>> The barrier was not intended to have anything to do with put_cpu()
>> either though since the barrier was added before put_cpu() arrived:
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=554ec063982752e9a569ab9189eeffa3d96731b2
>>
>> There's nothing in the commit comment explaining the barrier and I
>> really can't see what it is for.
>>
>
> Looks like it wasn't needed then either.
Agreed. I'll respin the patchset with the barrier removed.
Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists