[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323113437.28f6e682@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:34:37 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, dvhart@...ux.intel.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, bobby.prani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/9] Stop using ACCESS_ONCE (for v4.2)
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:25:07 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Not sure why this was 9 patches. I think this could have easily been a
> > single patch.
>
> In order to make it easier to deal with conflicts and to move patches
> across this series as needed. I could consolidate them later on, just
> before they are merged, if that would help.
No, just seemed odd to me. I usually do conversions in one big swoop if
it stays in a single subsystem and architecture. Splitting a conversion
by arch or subsystem makes sense. But these were all confined to
generic RCU.
But if you are sprinkling these within another series, then I guess it
does make sense.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists