[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323161400.GJ23123@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:14:00 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, yuyang.du@...el.com,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, mturquette@...aro.org, nico@...aro.org,
rjw@...ysocki.net, juri.lelli@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv3 PATCH 28/48] sched: Use capacity_curr to cap utilization
in get_cpu_usage()
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 06:31:05PM +0000, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> @@ -4596,9 +4596,10 @@ static int get_cpu_usage(int cpu)
> {
> unsigned long usage = cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.utilization_load_avg;
> unsigned long blocked = cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs.utilization_blocked_avg;
> + unsigned long capacity_curr = capacity_curr_of(cpu);
>
> - if (usage + blocked >= SCHED_LOAD_SCALE)
> - return capacity_orig_of(cpu);
> + if (usage + blocked >= capacity_curr)
> + return capacity_curr;
It makes more sense to do return capacity_curr_of(), since that defers
the computation capacity_curr_of() does to the point where its actually
required, instead of making it unconditional.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists