[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55104EAA.4060607@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 11:34:34 -0600
From: David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpicco@...oft.net
Subject: Re: 4.0.0-rc4: panic in free_block
On 3/23/15 10:25 AM, David Miller wrote:
> [PATCH] sparc64: Fix several bugs in memmove().
>
> Firstly, handle zero length calls properly. Believe it or not there
> are a few of these happening during early boot.
>
> Next, we can't just drop to a memcpy() call in the forward copy case
> where dst <= src. The reason is that the cache initializing stores
> used in the Niagara memcpy() implementations can end up clearing out
> cache lines before we've sourced their original contents completely.
>
> For example, considering NG4memcpy, the main unrolled loop begins like
> this:
>
> load src + 0x00
> load src + 0x08
> load src + 0x10
> load src + 0x18
> load src + 0x20
> store dst + 0x00
>
> Assume dst is 64 byte aligned and let's say that dst is src - 8 for
> this memcpy() call. That store at the end there is the one to the
> first line in the cache line, thus clearing the whole line, which thus
> clobbers "src + 0x28" before it even gets loaded.
>
> To avoid this, just fall through to a simple copy only mildly
> optimized for the case where src and dst are 8 byte aligned and the
> length is a multiple of 8 as well. We could get fancy and call
> GENmemcpy() but this is good enough for how this thing is actually
> used.
>
> Reported-by: David Ahern <david.ahern@...cle.com>
> Reported-by: Bob Picco <bpicco@...oft.net>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
seems like a formality at this point, but this resolves the panic on the
M7-based ldom and baremetal. The T5-8 failed to boot, but it could be a
different problem.
Thanks for the fast turnaround,
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists