[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150323193017.GA14179@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 12:30:17 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, linux-nvdimm@...1.01.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, mgorman@...e.de, hch@...radead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] evacuate struct page from the block layer
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:19:07AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> There are two things going on here:
>
> 1) You want to keep using struct page for now, while there are
> subsystems that require it. This is perfectly legitimate.
>
> 2) Matthew and Dan are changing over some subsystems to no longer
> require struct page. This is perfectly legitimate.
>
> I do not understand why either of you would have to object to what
> the other is doing. There is room to keep using struct page until
> the rest of the kernel no longer requires it.
*nod*
I'd really like to merge the struct page based pmem driver ASAP. We can
then look into work that avoid the need for struct page, and I think Dan
is doing some good work in that direction.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists