linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] eeprom: Add a simple EEPROM framework for eeprom providers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150324190226.GB17265@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:02:26 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] eeprom: Add a simple EEPROM framework for eeprom
 providers

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 06:34:32PM +0000, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 24/03/15 17:23, Mark Brown wrote:

> >>regmap_get_size(regmap)

> >This is already there.

> Sorry, I can't see any such api atleast in v4.0-rc5 and linux-next? Are you
> referring to another api which does the same job?

regmap_get_val_bytes()

> >>Which would be give eeprom-core the size and stride info, doing this way
> >>would cut down regmap related things from eeprom_config structure to minimal
> >>and also the source of information would come from just regmap apis.

> >Documentation/SubmittingPatches...

> Am not sure what you meant here, Am guessing that you asked me to keep the
> respective maintainers in the loop and follow the guide, when I resend the
> patch?

I'm saying that you should send patches if you want to add features.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)