linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/6] block: add support for carrying a stream ID in a bio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3A47B4705F6BE24CBB43C61AA73286215067DA@SSIEXCH-MB3.ssi.samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:07:11 +0000
From:	Ming Lin-SSI <ming.l@....samsung.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Matias Bjørling <m@...rling.me>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] block: add support for carrying a stream ID in a bio

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jens Axboe [mailto:axboe@...nel.dk]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 10:27 AM
> To: Matias Bjørling; Jens Axboe; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Ming Lin-SSI
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] block: add support for carrying a stream ID in a bio
> 
> On 03/24/2015 11:11 AM, Matias Bjørling wrote:
> > On 03/24/2015 04:26 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> The top bits of bio->bi_flags are reserved for keeping the allocation
> >> pool, set aside the next four bits for carrying a stream ID. That
> >> leaves us with support for 15 streams,
> >> 0 is reserved as a "stream not set" value.
> >
> > 15 streams seem very limited. Can this be extended? e.g. 16 bits.
> >
> > 15 streams is enough for 1-4 applications. More, and applications
> > starts to fight over the same stream id's, leading them to place
> > different age data in same flash blocks and push us back to square one.
> >
> > I understand that Samsung multi-stream SSD supports a limited amount
> > of streams, more advance implementations should provide higher limits.
> 
> Pushing it higher is not a big deal as far as the implementation goes, though
> 16 bits might be stealing a bit too much space for this. On 32-bit archs, we
> have 18 bits currently free that we can abuse. The Samsung device supports
> 16 streams. That's honestly a lot more than I would expect most devices to
> support in hardware, 16 is a lot of open erase blocks and write append points.
> Obviously the open channel effort would make that more feasible, though.

Can we use 8 bits at least? I'll test performance with 16 streams.

> 
> --
> Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/