linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: incorrect handling for fiemap_fill_next

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1427235176-19381-1-git-send-email-csong84@gatech.edu>
Date:	Tue, 24 Mar 2015 18:12:56 -0400
From:	Chengyu Song <csong84@...ech.edu>
To:	clm@...com, jbacik@...com, dsterba@...e.cz,
	linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	taesoo@...ech.edu, changwoo@...ech.edu, sanidhya@...ech.edu,
	blee@...ech.edu, csong84@...ech.edu
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: incorrect handling for fiemap_fill_next_extent return

fiemap_fill_next_extent returns 0 on success, -errno on error, 1 if this was
the last extent that will fit in user array. If 1 is returned, the return
value may eventually returned to user space, which should not happen, according
to manpage of ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Chengyu Song <csong84@...ech.edu>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
index d688cfe..782f3bc 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
@@ -4514,8 +4514,11 @@ int extent_fiemap(struct inode *inode, struct fiemap_extent_info *fieinfo,
 		}
 		ret = fiemap_fill_next_extent(fieinfo, em_start, disko,
 					      em_len, flags);
-		if (ret)
+		if (ret) {
+			if (ret == 1)
+				ret = 0;
 			goto out_free;
+		}
 	}
 out_free:
 	free_extent_map(em);
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/