[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5511F65A.5020505@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 16:42:18 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] x86, fpu: wrap get_xsave_addr() to make it safer
On 03/24/2015 03:28 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Your function appears to be getting it for write (I assume that's what
> the unlazy_fpu is for), so I'd rather have it called
> tsk_get_xsave_field_for_write or something like that.
It should be entirely read-only.
For MPX (the only user of get_xsave_addr() iirc), we are only worried
about getting the status codes (and addresses) out of the bndstatus
register and making sure that the kernel-recorded bounds directory
address matches the bndcfgu (configuration) register.
We don't ever write to the registers.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists