[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150324084316.GA7113@sudip-PC>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:13:16 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@...sys.com>,
David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@...sys.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: handle major number properly
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:32:47AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
<snip>
> > }
> > - rc = cdev_add(&file_cdev, MKDEV(MAJOR(majordev), 0), 1);
> > + rc = cdev_add(&file_cdev, MKDEV(major, 0), 1);
>
> This should just be:
>
> rc = cdev_add(&file_cdev, majordev, 1);
>
> So here is my suggestion:
>
> [patch 1] delete dead code I mentioned in my previous email.
> This deletes "registered" and the (MAJOR(majordev) >= 0) check.
that was initially my first patch.
>
> [patch 2] pass majordev to visorchipset_file_cleanup()
> This lets you delete the "majordev" global.
>
> [patch 3] small cleanup in visorchipset_file_init()
>
> - rc = cdev_add(&file_cdev, MKDEV(MAJOR(majordev), 0), 1);
> + rc = cdev_add(&file_cdev, majordev, 1);
and i can also include the removal of that global variable in this
3rd patch.
thanks.. after Greg's review i was thinking i understood the code wrong.
but then will this be a v2 or a whole new series?
regards
sudip
>
> There are several other ways you could break it up but do something like
> that.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists