linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150323.222934.1290096929224794650.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 23 Mar 2015 22:29:34 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	pablo@...filter.org
Cc:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kaber@...sh.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:47:23 +0100

> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 02:08:41PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
>> net/netfilter/nf_tables_core.c between commit 4017a7ee693d ("netfilter:
>> restore rule tracing via nfnetlink_log") from the net tree and commit
>> 01ef16c2dd2e ("netfilter: nf_tables: minor tracing cleanups") from the
>> net-next tree.
>> 
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> is required).
> 
> This looks good, thanks for adressing this conflict Stephen.

Pablo, I just pushed out a merge of net into net-next, please double
check that I handled this conflict correctly.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/